GUIDE · PRODUCT SELECTION

23 September 20266 MIN READ

Core Precisor’s Six Motion Configurations

Single-channel, dual-channel and symmetrical architectures: when a fixed reference laser is needed and which line suits which configuration. From K1 to K6, here is the question each configuration answers.

Investment and selectionCore Precisor

Engineering assessment

Choose the configuration on process behaviour, not on the number of laser lines

  • Compare K1–K6 on simultaneous visibility, recipe symmetry and the need for a permanent centre reference.
  • Verify cycle time against travel, acceleration and deceleration ramps, load and the number of positions.
  • Confirm the mechanical layout and accessibility by on-site measurement before the final choice.

Core Precisor carries servo-driven laser carriages inside an enclosed industrial profile. The number of carriages, the end they start from and whether a fixed reference sits at the centre together define the motion configuration . We have defined six standard arrangements, all running on the same housing and the same control infrastructure.

Why six arrangements?

Because lines differ on three questions: how many reference lines are needed at once, whether those lines sit symmetrically, and whether the machine centre has to stay visible. The six configurations are the meaningful combinations of those three.

Single channel: K1 and K2

K1 is the simplest arrangement: a single moving laser travels to each recipe position in turn. On a four-slit line it shows three laser reference lines in three steps, at the lowest investment and the lowest component count.

K2 adds, on top of the same motion, a fixed reference laser at the centre. The moving laser does the same job; the difference is that the machine centre stays visible throughout. On symmetrical recipes the operator keeps a permanent check point.

Dual channel: K3 and K4

K3, two moving lasers start from opposite ends of the travel and move towards each other. The same number of steps covers twice as many line positions: a six-slit recipe is set up in roughly half the steps a single channel needs.

K4 adds the fixed centre reference to K3. Here we should be honest: K4 does not reduce the step count. The fixed laser does not move, so it contributes nothing to the cycle. Its gain lies elsewhere: the centre reference is permanent, and symmetry can be checked by eye at every step.

Centre-out: K5 and K6

K5, the two moving lasers start at the centre and open outwards symmetrically. This is the natural motion for lines where slit width is set relative to the centre: the operator sees the arrangement expand from the middle out, matching how they think about the recipe.

K6 combines the same motion with a fixed reference at the centre. The two lines opening from the middle are positioned against a third, stationary line — the strongest arrangement for checking symmetry.

Which one for which line?

ArrangementMotionFixed referenceSuits which line
K1Single channel—Few slits, single reference; the lowest investment
K2Single channelAt the centreFew-slit lines where the centre must be checked continuously
K3Dual channel, from the ends—More slits; lines where setup time matters
K4Dual channel, from the endsAt the centreMulti-slit lines where verifying symmetry is critical
K5Symmetrical, from the centre—Lines where slit width is set relative to the centre
K6Symmetrical, from the centreAt the centreSymmetrical lines where a centre reference is indispensable

What determines the choice

  • How many reference lines are needed at once? Core Precisor shows the lines in sequence, step by step through the recipe. If every laser reference line has to stay visible throughout production, the right architecture is Shuttle Precisor.
  • Is the recipe symmetrical? If it is, K5/K6; if not, K1–K4 fits better.
  • How often is the centre checked? Once at the start of a shift, and the fixed laser is optional; on every product, and a permanent reference saves time.
What we see on site

Customers usually ask for the arrangement with the most features. Yet after three months of use the feedback is most often: “K2 would have been enough for us.” Do not count the steps — count how many times the operator takes a measurement . That is what determines the choice.

You can see all six arrangements at true millimetre scale, step by step, in the simulation on the Core Precisor product page .

WHAT DOES YOUR LINE NEED?

Share your alignment requirements and we will assess the laser layout, the motion architecture and the automation interfaces for your application together.

GET IN TOUCH

For short definitions of the terms used in this article, see the alignment glossary .

MAKE AN INFORMED INVESTMENT DECISION

We share technical articles, application examples and product updates by email as they are published, to make system selection and investment decisions easier.

Sign up for the e-newsletter

Your email address is processed only to send the newsletter, and you can unsubscribe at any time. For details, see our privacy notice.